Skip to main content
DEAL WATCH: Keurig K-Express | 22% off $69.99

Keurig has changed the face of coffee, and snagging one of these for less than $70 is a solid deal. Read Review

BUY NOW
  • Look and Feel

  • Through the Finder

  • Conclusion

  • Look and Feel
  • Through the Finder
  • Conclusion

At launch, just four lenses were available: two expensive Zeiss primes, a Zeiss 24–70mm f/4 normal zoom, and a Sony-branded "kit" zoom, the 28–70mm f/3.5–5.6. It was pretty slim pickings for anyone who wasn't bringing along a collection of legacy glass. Since then, Sony has launched the 70–200mm f/4 G OSS and announced the development of four other lenses including a macro and a 24–240mm superzoom.

But Sony has also outed the brand-new Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* 16–35mm f/4 ZA OSS (MSRP $1,349.99), which aims to give A7 early adopters a powerful yet lightweight tool for capturing landscapes, architecture, and even extreme sports. It's expected to hit store shelves in mid-November, but we got our hands on it ahead of schedule at Photokina 2014.

We tried out the Zeiss 16–35mm f/4 ZA on a Sony Alpha A7S.

We tried out the Zeiss 16–35mm f/4 ZA on a Sony Alpha A7S.

Look and Feel

Solid as a rock

Most Sony FE lenses feel like they're worth every penny of their not inconsiderable price tags. The new 16–35mm zoom is no exception. The body is made of metal (including the zoom and focus rings), it has a pleasant heft, and it feels like it's meant to be used—not just put on a shelf and admired.

It's made of metal, has a pleasant heft, and feels like it's meant to be used—not just put on a shelf and admired.

Though you can't tell from outward appearances, the 16–35mm is also dust- and weather-sealed. That said, it's anyone's guess whether the camera you mount it to will be.

The visceral impact of the Zeiss badge on the side may be a little watered down at this point thanks to the optics giant's overzealous co-branding of everything from webcams, to phones, to security cameras, but this one exudes quality. Inside are 12 elements in 10 groups, including 5 aspherical elements. One of those is an "advanced aspherical" piece, and three are ED glass elements. It takes a lot of special glass to prevent outlandish distortion when you're shooting at 16mm on full-frame.

The zoom ring is silky smooth, and the textured metal feels great.

The zoom ring is silky smooth, and the textured metal feels great.

At a little over a pound (18.3 oz), the 16–35mm f/4 certainly isn't featherlight, but it felt well-matched to the Alpha A7S it was paired with at Sony's booth. The zoom action was buttery smooth, and the manual focus feel, while far from that of a traditional Zeiss manual focus prime, was more than acceptable for the class.

This isn't a Power Zoom lens, so there aren't any buttons or levers anywhere on the lens body—it's a simple, purpose-built tool, and to that end it performs admirably.

{{ photo_gallery name="Design" }}

Through the Finder

Quality throughout, but watch those edges

On the Sony show floor at Photokina, my choice of subjects was a bit limited, but I was still able to take some early impressions away with me. (Sadly, I wasn't allowed to keep any photos to back them up.)

A Zeiss badge usually means quality, and that axiom holds true here.

A Zeiss badge usually means quality, and that axiom holds true here.

Sony claims the 16–35mm f/4's exotic glass is intended to counter distortion, and for the most part it seems to do an admirable job. Through the A7S's EVF, I could make out some slight curvature toward the edges of the frame at 16mm, but for the most part straight lines stayed straight. My coworker's head, however, doubled in height. (Be careful with wide-angle lenses and portraiture, guys!)

Looks serious, no?

Looks serious, no?

Optical SteadyShot stabilization (OSS) worked well, keeping both the EVF stabilized and images sharp. Images in playback certainly didn't want for fine detail, though it's worth noting that everything tends to look great through the A7S's brilliant OLED EVF. Zooming in to 35mm and keeping the aperture at f/4, I was able to produce some decently smooth bokeh, but this definitely isn't a portrait photographer's dream lens.

Autofocus was impressively quick, though not as blazing fast as we've seen from some other mirrorless camera/lens combos, including Sony's own A6000 and its kit lens. Even on a rather dim show floor, the camera had no trouble locking focus on distant subjects.

Images seemed impressively sharp, though everything tends to look great through the A7S's brilliant OLED EVF.

The minimum focus distance of 11 inches (throughout the entire zoom range) is perfectly acceptable, though nothing mindblowing. Still, it's closer than the Zeiss Sonnar T* 35mm f/2.8 can get, and up-close shots looked very crisp indeed.

Conclusion

Expensive? Sure. Worth it? Seems likely.

Ultimately, any new addition to the FE mount family is going to be welcomed with open arms by A7 shooters, purely thanks to the lack of available options. But the Zeiss 16–35mm f/4 ZA seems to be more than just another lens; it feels like one any system would be happy to have.

The $1,350 asking price is on the high side (as are all of the current FE lenses) but it's actually only a little bit more expensive than Nikon's own 16–35mm f/4 VR, for instance. And that lens is comparably massive and made of plastic.

The Zeiss 16–35mm f/4 ZA seems like more than just another lens; it feels like one any system would be happy to have.

We'll have to reserve final judgment on the lens's optical quality until we can test one under lab conditions, but everything we saw at Photokina points toward a winning combination of build and image quality—something Sony's full-frame E-mount users have come to expect.

Meet the tester

Ben Keough

Ben Keough

Contributor

@ben_keough

Ben is an experienced industry journalist who formerly served as Senior Editor of News and Features at Reviewed. He now contributes as a freelance writer and editor. Most recently hailing from the vast wilds of the American southwest, he is an avid photographer who is deeply disturbed by the lack of wide open landscapes in Boston.

See all of Ben Keough's reviews

Checking our work.

Our team is here for one purpose: to help you buy the best stuff and love what you own. Our writers, editors, and lab technicians obsess over the products we cover to make sure you're confident and satisfied. Have a different opinion about something we recommend? Email us and we'll compare notes.

Shoot us an email

Up next